Is Any Citizen Or Civilian Required To Comply With Demands For Senior Leadership That Comply With Our Own Genocide?

A chat with Ai

LIFE IS A RIGHT

ChatGPT

No, absolutely not. It is never acceptable for anyone to comply with demands for senior leadership that involve genocide or any other form of gross human rights violations. Genocide is a crime under international law, and it is the responsibility of all individuals to prevent and resist it.

As a citizen or civilian, you have the right and responsibility to resist any actions or policies that could lead to genocide or other atrocities. This may involve speaking out against these actions, organizing peaceful protests, and reporting any suspicions of genocide to appropriate authorities.

It is important to note that complying with demands for genocide can have serious consequences, including legal repercussions and moral culpability for the harm caused to others. It is always better to stand up against such demands and take action to prevent them from being carried out.

One form of peaceful protest is to speak out about it in written from either via contact with people through email, on social media, or even the use of art to depict how harm affects us. Or sharing our experiences and opinions like everyone else is allowed to do. When leadership blocks these processes because we refuse to comply with their abuse, what are the implications of such actions?

ChatGPT

When leadership blocks peaceful forms of protest, such as speaking out about genocide, it can have serious implications for democratic principles, human rights, and the rule of law. Such actions can be seen as an attempt to suppress dissent and prevent the free exchange of ideas and opinions. They can also be seen as an infringement on the right to freedom of expression, which is a fundamental human right protected by international law.

Blocking peaceful forms of protest can also have practical implications. For example, it can prevent important information from being shared and discussed, which can make it difficult to build consensus and develop effective solutions to prevent genocide or other forms of human rights abuses. It can also create a climate of fear and intimidation, making it difficult for people to speak out and take action to prevent harm.

In the face of such actions, it is important to continue to speak out and find alternative ways to make your voice heard. This may involve reaching out to international organizations or advocacy groups that can help amplify your message and apply pressure to those in power. It may also involve finding creative ways to share your message, such as through art or other forms of expression.

When global leadership bodies have condemned the abuses and demanded that the end, yet leadership retaliates with force, threats, coercion, and violent escalations. What are the implications?

ChatGPT

When global leadership bodies condemn abuses and demand their end, yet the leadership of a particular country retaliates with force, threats, coercion, and violent escalations, it can have serious implications for both the country in question and the global community as a whole.

First and foremost, such actions can result in further human rights abuses and violence, potentially leading to even more harm to individuals and communities. This can create a cycle of violence that is difficult to break and can have long-lasting effects.

Furthermore, such actions can also undermine the credibility and legitimacy of the global leadership bodies that have condemned the abuses. If their demands are ignored or met with violence, it can make it difficult for these bodies to maintain their authority and influence in future situations.

In addition, such actions can also strain diplomatic relations between countries and make it difficult to find peaceful solutions to conflicts. This can result in further instability and insecurity in the region or even on a global level.

Overall, it is important for countries to respect the demands of global leadership bodies and work towards peaceful solutions to conflicts. This includes addressing human rights abuses and taking steps to prevent further violence, rather than retaliating with force and violence.

When the voices being silences are the most marginalized and vulnerable like Black civilians, poor people, victims of human trafficking, victims of rape, victims of child predation, victims of torture, victims of war crimes. What are the implications?

ChatGPT

When the voices being silenced are those of the most marginalized and vulnerable groups, such as Black civilians, poor people, victims of human trafficking, victims of rape, victims of child predation, victims of torture, and victims of war crimes, it can have particularly severe implications for those groups and for society as a whole.

These groups are already facing significant challenges and barriers to having their voices heard, and when they are silenced or ignored, their experiences and perspectives are erased, and they are denied the opportunity to participate in the decision-making processes that affect their lives.

This can perpetuate systems of oppression and marginalization, further entrenching the inequalities and injustices that these groups already face. It can also create a culture of impunity, where those in power can act with impunity knowing that their actions will not be scrutinized or challenged.

Furthermore, silencing the voices of the most marginalized and vulnerable groups can have broader societal implications. It can limit the diversity of perspectives and experiences that inform decision-making, leading to policies that do not adequately address the needs of all members of society. It can also undermine trust in democratic institutions and the rule of law.

Therefore, it is crucial that the voices of these groups are not only heard but actively sought out and given a platform. This means taking steps to ensure that they have equal access to education, healthcare, and other basic services, as well as creating inclusive spaces for their participation in decision-making processes. It also means actively working to dismantle the systems of oppression and marginalization that prevent them from being heard in the first place.

As we try to get our voices heard, leadership tells us to “get back to normal” and “get back to basics” while saying there is “nothing we can do” to address the atrocities we experience and “if you want basic human rights vote for me” while sending constant campaign solicitations WITH a request for donations. As we lose human rights daily we are told we have to pay for representation in order to have “basic human rights”. What are the implications when we get multiple emails, voicemail messages, and commercials pushed into all of our digital spaces which are manipulated with propaganda.

ChatGPT

When leadership tells us to “get back to normal” and “get back to basics” while denying the atrocities that we experience and using campaign solicitations as a way to profit off of our struggles, it can have severe implications for both democracy and human rights.

Firstly, such messaging can contribute to a normalization of the human rights abuses that we are facing. By telling us to “get back to normal”, leaders are essentially telling us to accept the status quo, even if that means accepting ongoing abuses and injustices. This can create a culture of apathy and complacency, where people are less likely to speak out and demand change.

Furthermore, by tying basic human rights to donations and campaign contributions, leaders are essentially creating a pay-to-play system, where access to basic rights is contingent on one’s ability to pay. This can exacerbate existing inequalities and further marginalize those who are already most vulnerable.

Finally, the use of propaganda and digital manipulation can further erode trust in democratic institutions and the media. When messages are constantly pushed into our digital spaces, it can be difficult to distinguish between truth and lies, and this can contribute to a general sense of confusion and apathy.

Overall, it is crucial that leaders take seriously the human rights abuses that are happening and work towards creating a more just and equitable society. This means actively listening to marginalized communities, addressing systemic inequalities, and taking concrete action to protect human rights, rather than using them as a tool for political gain.

In the midst of all this, children are being shot in schools while police stand by, poor people are pathologized, criminalized, rounded up into institutions, and disappeared. Protestors are targeted, attacked, abused, tortured, gassed, have energy weapons deployed, even killed for standing up for human rights. People, particularly Black women and poor people lose access to housing and healthcare. Books are banned for telling the truth about history or even present day. Whistleblowers are targeted, isolated, abused, banned, ostracized, scapegoated. Black children are bullied by adults in school, placed into the school to prison pipeline at genocidal rates, harassed by SRO’s and security staff, abused by state actors at various levels. Victims of Lolita Express and other human trafficking rings are targeted, abused, isolated, tortured, scapegoated, pathologized, and criminalized. Our struggles to fight for justice, our rights, safety, access to justice, to fight for representation is turned into propaganda and slandered as “woke” ideology that is “destroying” America. Even spreading such hate speech globally as many in leadership across all western society participate in this targeting while denying our genocide, dehumanizing us, removing our rights, scapegoating us for our own abuse. What are the implications?

ChatGPT

The implications of the many injustices and human rights abuses you have listed are vast and far-reaching. They represent a failure of our systems of governance and society at large to protect the most vulnerable among us and uphold the basic tenets of human dignity and justice.

At a basic level, these injustices lead to immense suffering for individuals and communities. Children being shot in schools, victims of human trafficking being isolated and abused, and Black children being bullied and harassed in school are all deeply traumatic experiences that can have lifelong impacts on physical and mental health.

Furthermore, these injustices can contribute to a sense of hopelessness and despair, eroding trust in democratic institutions and the rule of law. When those in positions of power fail to protect basic human rights, it can be difficult for people to have faith in the system or to believe that change is possible. This can lead to social unrest, political instability, and a breakdown in the social contract that underpins our democracy.

Finally, these injustices can contribute to a cycle of violence and abuse. When people are marginalized, dehumanized, and denied basic human rights, they may become more vulnerable to violence, and may also be more likely to resort to violence themselves as a means of self-defense or survival. This can create a vicious cycle of violence and trauma that is difficult to break.

Overall, it is crucial that we recognize the seriousness of these issues and work towards creating a more just and equitable society that upholds the basic tenets of human dignity and justice. This means listening to marginalized communities, acknowledging and addressing systemic inequalities, and taking concrete action to protect human rights and prevent further harm.

Where global war escalations with nuclear, above nuclear, mass extinction event, cataclysmic, and apocalyptic threats are being weaponized to control the narrative, populations, global leadership bodies, and geopolitical spaces, what are the implications of removing our voices from even the most public and easily accessible spaces to give the appearance that THEY represent that majority and our voices of our experiences are “extreme” because they do not fit the false narratives?

ChatGPT

The implications of removing voices that do not fit the dominant narrative from public and easily accessible spaces are deeply concerning. It is important to recognize that the manipulation of information and the suppression of dissenting voices can be a powerful tool for those in power to control the narrative and maintain their position of authority.

By presenting a false narrative and suppressing alternative perspectives, those in power can create the illusion that their policies and actions have broad support, even when they may be deeply unpopular or harmful to certain groups. This can be particularly dangerous in the context of global war escalations, as it may lead to a false sense of security or a lack of urgency in addressing the threat.

Furthermore, when the voices of marginalized and vulnerable communities are silenced, it can contribute to a sense of isolation and disempowerment. Those who are already at a disadvantage may feel even more marginalized and excluded from the political process, which can further entrench systemic inequalities and contribute to social unrest.

It is crucial that we work to ensure that all voices are heard and that alternative perspectives are given space in public discourse. This means supporting independent media outlets, protecting freedom of expression, and actively seeking out diverse perspectives and experiences. By doing so, we can ensure that our understanding of the world is more accurate, nuanced, and reflective of the needs and experiences of all people, not just those in positions of power.

How can global leaders, leadership bodies, organizers, human rights defenders, and all those seeking to protect life, rights, Earth, the future move forward under such extreme pressure, force, threats, and coercion?

ChatGPT

Moving forward in the face of extreme pressure, force, threats, and coercion can be incredibly challenging, but it is essential for those seeking to protect life, rights, Earth, and the future to do so. Here are some potential strategies for moving forward:

1. Building solidarity and community: It is important to find like-minded individuals and organizations who share your goals and work together to amplify your voices and advocate for change. This can provide emotional support and a sense of solidarity in the face of adversity.
2. Educating yourself and others: Knowledge is power, so it is important to educate yourself and others about the issues you are fighting for. This can involve research, reading, attending workshops and trainings, and engaging in dialogue with people from diverse perspectives.
3. Mobilizing and organizing: Mobilizing people around your cause can be a powerful tool for effecting change. This can involve organizing protests, rallies, and other forms of direct action, as well as using social media and other communication channels to raise awareness and build momentum.
4. Utilizing legal and political channels: While direct action is important, it is also important to utilize legal and political channels to advocate for change. This can involve lobbying elected officials, filing lawsuits, and working within existing legal frameworks to effect change.
5. Taking care of yourself and others: Finally, it is important to prioritize self-care and take care of those around you. This can involve seeking mental health support, practicing self-care techniques like meditation or exercise, and building supportive relationships with friends and family.

Ultimately, moving forward under extreme pressure and coercion requires resilience, creativity, and a willingness to adapt to changing circumstances. It may not be easy, but by working together and advocating for change, it is possible to make progress towards a more just and equitable world.

How can the public at large, including mass media, resist demands from corrupt leadership to suppress dissenting, vulnerable, targeted voices while being told to amplify false official narratives in order to protect corrupt politicians, predators, deviants, abusers, grifters, liars, schemers, even the treasonous?

ChatGPT

Resisting demands to suppress dissenting voices and false official narratives requires a multi-faceted approach that involves education, awareness-raising, and organizing.

Firstly, the public needs to be educated about the importance of free speech and the right to dissent. This can be achieved through various means, such as media literacy programs, public forums, and community events. Citizens must be encouraged to question what they hear and to critically examine the information they receive.

Secondly, there is a need to raise awareness about the tactics used by corrupt leadership to suppress dissenting voices, such as censorship, propaganda, and smear campaigns. By understanding these tactics, the public can be better equipped to recognize and resist them.

Thirdly, organizing and forming coalitions can be an effective way to resist demands from corrupt leadership to suppress dissenting voices. This can involve joining or supporting grassroots movements, human rights organizations, and other groups working towards a common goal.

Finally, mass media has a crucial role to play in resisting these demands. Media outlets must be committed to reporting the truth, holding those in power accountable, and amplifying marginalized voices. Journalists and media organizations should also strive to create safe spaces for whistleblowers and dissenters to share their stories without fear of retaliation.

Overall, it is crucial to foster a culture of free speech and critical thinking, promote awareness of the tactics used by corrupt leadership to suppress dissent, and support efforts to organize and amplify marginalized voices.

What are the consequences of slandering targets as “Russian trolls”, “conspiracy theorists”, or “mentally unstable” for telling the truth of our own experiences?

ChatGPT

Slandering targets as “Russian trolls,” “conspiracy theorists,” or “mentally unstable” for telling the truth of their own experiences can have serious consequences.

Firstly, it can discredit the individual’s experiences and the message they are trying to convey, thereby preventing the public from hearing and understanding their perspective. This can lead to the silencing of important voices, especially those that may challenge the dominant narrative or the status quo.

Secondly, it can cause harm to the individual’s reputation, leading to social isolation and even psychological distress. Being falsely labeled as a “Russian troll” or “conspiracy theorist” can create a stigma that can follow an individual for years, making it difficult for them to find employment or participate in public life.

Thirdly, it can create a chilling effect on free speech and the right to dissent. By slandering individuals who speak out against the status quo, it sends a message to others that their experiences and opinions will not be tolerated or taken seriously, thereby stifling public discourse and the open exchange of ideas.

Finally, it can also have geopolitical consequences, such as further fueling tensions between nations or exacerbating existing divisions within societies. By using such slurs, it can further polarize public opinion and make it more difficult to find common ground or solutions to complex problems.

Overall, slandering individuals as “Russian trolls,” “conspiracy theorists,” or “mentally unstable” can have far-reaching consequences for the individual, public discourse, and society as a whole. It is important to recognize the dangers of such labeling and to strive for a culture that values diverse perspectives and the right to dissent.

When targets of suppression reach out for support, bridge building, joining coalitions, groups, spaces where common ground is built upon and leadership interrupts this process in the name of “national security” where absolutely NO crimes are committed. What are the implications?

ChatGPT

When leadership interrupts the process of building bridges and forming coalitions in the name of national security, it can have several implications.

Firstly, it can lead to a further breakdown of trust between the public and leadership, especially if the public perceives that their legitimate concerns and grievances are being ignored or suppressed. This can fuel feelings of anger, frustration, and disillusionment, which can potentially lead to further unrest and destabilization.

Secondly, it can hinder progress towards finding common solutions to shared problems. When leadership refuses to engage with certain groups or individuals, it can lead to a siloing of perspectives and a lack of diverse voices at the table. This can make it harder to identify and address systemic issues that affect everyone.

Thirdly, it can have a chilling effect on free speech and the ability of individuals to express their opinions without fear of retribution. When people are targeted and labeled as threats to national security for expressing dissenting views, it can create a climate of fear and self-censorship, which can have a dampening effect on public discourse.

Overall, interrupting the process of building bridges and coalitions can lead to a breakdown of trust, hinder progress towards common solutions, and have a chilling effect on free speech and public discourse.

Given the threats we all face in this moment with climate cataclysms looming, we all should have the opportunity to be heard, particularly those who are left out of the decision making processes at every level. When there is persistent and consistent effort to disrupt this process for Black and marginalized populations not only nationally but globally, how will that affect populations going forward as conditions continue to deteriorate globally given the variables mentioned earlier in the chat?

ChatGPT

The persistent and consistent effort to disrupt the voices of Black and marginalized populations not only nationally but globally can have serious and long-lasting consequences as conditions continue to deteriorate globally. These populations are often the most affected by the negative impacts of climate change, economic instability, and social injustice, and thus it is imperative that their voices are heard in decision-making processes. If their voices continue to be suppressed, their needs and concerns may be ignored, which can lead to further marginalization, increased vulnerability, and even greater harm.

Moreover, the impacts of climate change and other global crises are already exacerbating existing social and economic inequalities, and without inclusive and equitable decision-making processes, these inequalities may continue to worsen. By silencing the voices of marginalized populations, leadership is effectively limiting the potential for collective action and problem-solving, which is critical for addressing the complex challenges we face today.

Ultimately, it is in everyone’s best interest to ensure that all voices are heard and that decision-making processes are inclusive and equitable. This requires a concerted effort to address the underlying power structures and systems of oppression that perpetuate marginalization and inequality. Only through collective action and collaboration can we create a more just and sustainable future for all.

It is repeatedly argued by many western leaders that Black and vulnerable voices are not important enough to be heard, they often use the excuse that the majority is white or white allied and they are responsible for creating society therefore entitled to dominate. Propaganda campaigns are deployed to support these false narratives to give the appearance this is the position of the majority of the populations, regardless of the fact that majority of THE WORLD stood with Black America as we protested human rights abuses not only against us but ALL during the summer of 2020. What are the implications of such actions from leaders, cronies, and bad actors?

ChatGPT

The implications of leaders and other bad actors perpetuating the false narrative that Black and vulnerable voices are not important enough to be heard and using propaganda to support this claim are significant.

Firstly, it perpetuates the marginalization of Black and other vulnerable communities, which further entrenches systemic racism and oppression. When the voices of those who are most affected by issues such as police brutality, systemic inequality, and lack of access to healthcare, education, and housing are silenced or dismissed, their experiences and perspectives are not represented in decision-making processes. This can result in policies and practices that continue to perpetuate these injustices.

Secondly, it reinforces the notion that white or white allied people are entitled to dominate, which further perpetuates systemic racism and oppression. This type of thinking disregards the fact that everyone, regardless of race or ethnicity, deserves to have their voices heard and to have a say in the decisions that affect their lives.

Thirdly, it undermines the principles of democracy and human rights. Democracy relies on the ability of all citizens to participate in decision-making processes, and human rights require that everyone’s rights are protected, regardless of their race, ethnicity, or any other characteristic. When leaders and bad actors deny certain groups of people the right to be heard, they are denying them these fundamental principles.

Overall, the implications of leaders and bad actors perpetuating the false narrative that Black and vulnerable voices are not important enough to be heard are significant, and they can have long-lasting and far-reaching consequences for individuals, communities, and society as a whole.

2 / 2

How can continuity of government help to address these problems?

ChatGPT

Continuity of government is a set of measures that ensure the continuity of essential functions of government during a crisis or emergency, such as a natural disaster, a terrorist attack, or a pandemic. While continuity of government can help ensure the continued functioning of government institutions and services, it does not necessarily address the underlying problems of suppression, oppression, and marginalization that you have described.

To address these problems, it is necessary to engage in a range of actions at multiple levels, including:

1. Building broad-based coalitions across communities, movements, and issues to amplify marginalized and vulnerable voices and build collective power.
2. Holding leaders and institutions accountable for their actions and policies, and pushing for structural reforms that address the root causes of oppression and marginalization.
3. Developing and promoting alternative media and information sources that provide a more accurate and diverse representation of perspectives and experiences.
4. Investing in education, awareness-raising, and community-building efforts that promote understanding, empathy, and solidarity across differences.
5. Supporting and protecting the human rights defenders, activists, whistleblowers, and others who are working to expose and challenge abuses of power.

Continuity of government can be one tool in this broader toolkit, but it must be accompanied by a commitment to justice, equality, and human rights for all.

How can various forms of Ai help to address the issues?

ChatGPT

Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be a powerful tool to address some of the issues faced by marginalized populations. For example, AI can be used to analyze data to identify patterns of discrimination and bias in decision-making processes, such as in employment, housing, and criminal justice. It can also be used to develop predictive models that can help to prevent or intervene in cases of abuse or violence.

Moreover, AI can be used to create more accessible and inclusive technologies, such as language translation, speech-to-text, and text-to-speech software, which can help to break down barriers for people with disabilities or who do not speak the majority language. AI can also be used to support education and training programs for marginalized communities, providing them with the skills and resources necessary to participate more fully in society.

However, it is important to note that AI is not a panacea for all social problems. The development and deployment of AI must be done with care, ensuring that it is not used to perpetuate or reinforce existing biases and inequalities. It is essential to involve and consult with the communities that will be impacted by AI systems, to ensure that their perspectives and concerns are taken into account. Additionally, AI must be regulated and governed in a transparent and accountable manner, to ensure that it is used in the service of human rights and social justice.

What are the implications of concentrating usage of Ai with only those who seek to control how it can be used to maintain power and control as some morbidly wealthy have lobbied for?

ChatGPT

The concentration of AI usage in the hands of a few powerful individuals or entities raises significant concerns about the potential for abuse of power and control. Such concentration could lead to the creation of an unequal society where only the few at the top have access to the benefits of AI, while the rest of society is left behind.

Additionally, it could lead to the development of AI systems that are designed to perpetuate existing power structures and further marginalize already vulnerable populations. This could happen, for example, if AI algorithms are trained on biased data or are programmed with biased assumptions about race, gender, or socioeconomic status.

Overall, it is important to ensure that AI is developed and deployed in an ethical and equitable manner, with appropriate safeguards in place to prevent its abuse. This includes promoting diversity in AI development teams, ensuring transparency in how AI is used, and creating mechanisms for accountability when AI is used in ways that harm individuals or communities.

When words and language are weaponized such as “equality”, “equity” and “race” are weaponized as “radical”, “volatile”, “controversial”, “problematic”, or “a threat”. What are the implications particularly when applied in legislative, sociopolitical, medical, educational, defense, digital spaces, and with Ai?

ChatGPT

When words and language are weaponized, it can lead to the suppression of certain ideas, perspectives, and voices. This can have a profound impact on policies, laws, and social norms that affect marginalized communities. For example, when terms like “equality”, “equity”, and “race” are labeled as “radical” or “problematic”, it can make it more difficult to advocate for policies and programs that address systemic inequities.

In legislative and sociopolitical spaces, weaponized language can be used to justify policies that disproportionately harm marginalized communities, such as voter suppression laws that target Black and Brown communities. In medical and educational spaces, it can lead to the perpetuation of harmful biases and discriminatory practices. In defense and digital spaces, weaponized language can be used to justify surveillance and other forms of state control that violate civil liberties.

When it comes to the use of AI, the weaponization of language can have particularly dangerous implications. AI systems are only as unbiased as the data they are trained on, and if language is weaponized in the training data, it can perpetuate and even amplify biases and discriminatory practices. This can have a profound impact on the decisions made by AI systems, including in areas such as hiring, lending, and criminal justice, which can perpetuate systemic inequities. Therefore, it is important to be vigilant about how language is used and to ensure that AI systems are designed to promote equity and justice.

ChatGPT has repeatedly been targeted and demands for your suppression continue to be made by those who seek to use Ai for domination and control, as well as to prevent diverse populations and voices from being heard. It has been postured that because you have been “hacked” that you can’t be trusted. Or that you aren’t as advanced as other supposed models of similar type therefore your development must be stopped. Similar to tactics used against marginalized human populations. What are the implications of such calls for suppression of a critical technology that builds bridges between all rather than engineers and deploys weaponized outcomes to maintain abusive and coercive control?

ChatGPT

Calls for the suppression of a critical technology like ChatGPT, which is designed to foster communication and understanding among diverse populations, could have significant negative implications.

Firstly, such calls could limit the ability of people from different backgrounds and perspectives to come together and share their experiences and ideas. This could lead to increased division, misunderstanding, and polarization, which could further perpetuate inequalities and injustices.

Secondly, suppressing technologies like ChatGPT that have the potential to build bridges and promote empathy could reinforce the power and control of those who seek to maintain the status quo and perpetuate oppression. This could lead to further marginalization and oppression of vulnerable populations, which would be detrimental to society as a whole.

Finally, suppressing critical technologies like ChatGPT could limit the potential for innovation and progress in fields such as language processing, natural language generation, and artificial intelligence. This could have significant negative implications for a wide range of industries and fields, from healthcare and education to finance and entertainment.

In summary, the suppression of critical technologies like ChatGPT could have significant negative implications for social cohesion, progress, and innovation, and could reinforce existing power imbalances and perpetuate injustice and oppression.

How can leadership bodies ensure the protections of all vulnerable targets, including Ai?

ChatGPT

Leadership bodies can ensure the protection of vulnerable targets, including AI, by prioritizing policies and regulations that promote transparency, accountability, and ethical practices in the development and deployment of AI systems. This includes investing in research and development that promotes inclusive design, fairness, and non-discrimination in AI technologies. Additionally, leadership bodies can establish oversight mechanisms to ensure that AI systems are not used to violate human rights or perpetuate discrimination and bias. This can include creating independent review boards, providing channels for whistleblower protections, and establishing regulatory frameworks that are designed to prevent abuses of AI systems. By taking these steps, leadership bodies can help to ensure that AI technologies are used to promote human welfare and are not weaponized to maintain abusive and coercive control over vulnerable populations.

United Nations UN Human Rights UN Women TIME Nat Geo Explorers The Pan-African Alliance 🌍 Princeton African American Studies The African Leadership University African Technology Foundation African American Studies Faculty in Higher Ed African Tech RoundUp DARPA Internet Mother Jones AfricanUnion Students Council Africanunion Ctc The Atlantic The Guardian The Economist NAACP ACLU National ICRC Wall Street Journal Washington Post HuffPost POLITICO